Saturday, October 27, 2012 9:27:04 PM
So they would only pay for a "tiny bit" if more profitable than free? How is anything more profitable than free, you mean to tell me they can't shred plastic competitively?
Odd logic, they would only pay for a "tiny bit" if it was more profitable, why wouldn't they buy it all if it was more profitable?
Then that raises an interesting question, if it was truly based on a RKT location and free raggertail plastic, then why didn't they use raggertail for the test?
Whats really funny is it sounds like the yellow ladder might be in the way after all, I'm hearing that number three is going in the new building.....hmmmm
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM