InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 170
Posts 22202
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/21/2006

Re: Jcrou73 post# 1993

Wednesday, 10/24/2012 3:42:19 PM

Wednesday, October 24, 2012 3:42:19 PM

Post# of 2360
Wouldn't it be better to quote the entire verbiage about the 2004 event?

The paragraphs below have NOTHING to do with current suspension.

On April 26, 2004, the SEC temporarily suspended trading of the common stock of the Company on the over-the–counter bulletin board, because it appeared to the SEC that “there was a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of (the Company) because of questions regarding the accuracy of assertions by (the company) and by others, in press releases and public statements to investors concerning, among other things, (the company’s) business relationship with a national restaurant chain.”

The Company cooperated with the SEC in its investigation, and the investigation was subsequently closed with no enforcement action taken. All records obtained by the SEC in the investigation have been returned to the Company. The Company subsequently filed new public information disclosures with FINRA, and now trades on the over-the-counter bulletin board under the trading symbol SMNG.



http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8876263

Step aside son, you're blockin' the MOMO! ... .. Disproving absence of evidence should be easy, show the evidence of.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.