Spot on DD and completely agree. To me, it's not just a matter of how great a drug a company may potentially have, but it's to what extent such success is already priced in. At almost $4B market cap and likely a large extent of that attributed solely to ponatinib (and despite some questions of how the drug will fare with the advent of generic Gleevec), I don't think it's unreasonable at all to question upside here and potential downside in the event something goes wrong. If I'm going to play a biotech around this type of valuation, I'd prefer something like SGEN where you get a valuation supported by a massive pipeline underneath and not just supported by one or two drugs.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.