Mine in red. That way you'll be able to find them easily, assuming you're not colorblind.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A reply to a Post>
I just copied the post, a little easier answering the POST:
Do you also have NO problem with letting investors think the items placed were paid for, as was the case with those big, reputable medical centers in Houston and merrie olde, and also NO problem with not having told those same investors (and future ones) that the placed items were returned to sender because they didn't do what was advertised on the tin?
ANS: Mr. Brumfield did not send "ANYTHING" to Houston. Did I say he did? Why in the world did you feel you had to remind me who was running the good ship loxipop in those days? ASF!
Of course not. Why ruin a good story with a touch of truth?
ANS: Please post where Mr. Brumfield sent anything to Houston and/or the PR that said he did. TIA! See above comment.
Whatever works, right?
ANS: That sentence is right, which is exactly why the Boone's, Baker's, Shriver's, Ryle's, and Philip's are NOT around. Your ability to make a cohesive argument leaves something to be desired. 'Whatever works' is what I posted, and any 3rd grader would know that it referred to the immediately preceding sentence, which was 'Why ruin a good story with a touch of truth?' Two rhetorical questions with self-evident answers. Nothing more, nothing less.
Let's see what kind of PRs can be created for upcoming placements. They'll be made possible because of the efforts of Dr. Terrell, won't they? Is he the new, domestic version of the international M. Pouligny? I notice that you chose to ignore these questions. Why is that?
ANS: I am looking forward to the upcoming PRs. Imo, there will be many responsible for the placements. So they will be placements and not sales? Is that what you're confirming?
When can we expect the announcement PR about the first placement of the about to be finished new product(s)? Who will write it and who will sign it?
ANS: I have no idea, not at all sure I believe you. You're very close to the action, a fact you want everyone to know, so my "guess" is you know a whole lot more than you would like to say except in oblique (look it up) hints. but imo, December might be a good pick. Imo, the writers will be, Dr. Poteet, Mr. Brumfield, Mr. Starzinger, Dr. Terrell, and possibly one or two more. Only part of my question asnwered. With all those writers, who will sign it, all 5 or 6 contributors? Will you be one of the 'possibly one or two more'?
This company under its various names and leadership has come a lonnnnnnnng way since it decided the scam du jour was going to be built on Diana's concerns about land mines (incredible edible cotton seeds just weren't compelling enough). Now, after a temporary stall to free itself of debt, it's being revitalized by the war on illicit drugs or contaminated hospital solutions.
ANS: Mr. Brumfield was not around in those land mine days, NOR are any of the land mine leadership team. Again, did I say he/they were? Mr. Brumfield was not part of the super duper cotton seed team either. Ditto. Mr. Brumfield and his Lab team, are on illict drugs are they really? They should find a good outpatient rehab center for help. btw ... who is on his lab team? Name(s), please.and making hospital's safer. Aha ... you actually got the point: the newest "product" allegedly being perfected and about to be "placed" by this company into eagerly awaiting hands (per Mr. Brumfield in court filings). And this product is making hospitals safer. Can you be more specific, please? What hospital(s) has this product made safer? And of course you shouild probably cite your source.
Oh wow. Let's see how well that works.
ANS: I do believe we will, imo.
Plus ca change.
ANS: Let's hope for all shareholders and creditor's sake, there is "ca change"! I didn't know you liked cross-language puns. I'll have to remember that.
Have at it, pennstreet. Show me the flaws in this post. Be very very precise and do try to control your LOLs
ANS: LOL!!!
Sorry, you flunked. Refused to answer simple, straightforward questions. Couldn't create a coherent line of thinking. Gave no evidence to support continuation of hyperpump. Tried to use what's evidently supposed to pass as humor throughout.
Not your best work, pennstreet. If you'd like to try again, feel free.
AI
