I agree, it is repairable, including lasters decision, the reciever NEVER delisted the stock it happened without him rendering an opinion--this is in calypso's favor
that the court validates the patent--this is in calypso's favor
that companies have "exited recievership" --this is in calypso's favor
further according to wikipedia:
"While all eight justices (Justice Alito did not participate) joined the majority opinion penned by Justice Thomas which stated that there should be no general rule as to when an injunction should issue in a patent case, there were two concurring opinions with three and four justices respectively, setting out suggested guidelines for granting injunctions.
Chief Justice Roberts wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Justices Scalia and Ginsburg, pointing out that from "at least the early 19th century, courts have granted injunctive relief upon a finding of infringement in the vast majority of patent cases," by applying the four-factor test."
trust me, mathiews knows and would have never taken this case if it could not meet the 4 factor test--infact my gut says calypso totally eclipses it and that they had a nda is proof
bottom line is the supreme court will never hear to reverse the upcomming injunction because its already been heard--all of tmobiles actions thus far have been frivolus and an injunction will shout that out loud and clear!
