Yep. VM's been referred to as an asset all along, and it must have been, and it must still be from a legal standpoint, even though we're duking it out in court with Montecito.
I just think the market would like to see something a little stronger than a toe hold on that asset, before pricing it in, and in lieu of a favorable settlement in the case I'm content for any re-affirmation from the company that the deal's still in play.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.