InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,389.05
(
0.22%
)
Post# of 30990
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

thefamilyman

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 38
Posts 2912
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2012

thefamilyman

Re: Bungler post# 6288

Sunday, 10/14/2012 1:11:33 AM

Sunday, October 14, 2012 1:11:33 AM

Post# of 30990
Bungler - "So at this time, the legal status is the patents have not been shown to be invalid based on prior art and are conclusively not indefinite under 35 USC 112."

Thank you Bungler! So theoretically someone could possibly find and produce new evidence to challenge validity based on "prior art". However, the question of indefiniteness regarding those patents is settled for all time. That's good to know!
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up