I know its been hard, and at times, myself included, one looks at some of the technical jargon and past patents refered to by tmobile etc and our hearts start to sink. In the end its the coupling with the business aspect to the viscinity that super womps the erickson quality of service issue. quality of service simply does not contemplate the value of clustering backhaul into a process meaningfull to both the user and the carrier alike
like dsu, i agree that calypso owns seamless roaming, not because quality of service doesn't make sense but because targeting a vicinity to cut costs makes infinitely more sense.
In the end, i believe the judge will give an injunction and admonish tmobile for being so uncooperative with calypso, it will not matter if this was simply blind oversight or insidious conniving and because tmobile posessed the power to get it right all along they will be taken to task in the fullest possible way
trebble damages is a given
