InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 400
Posts 48613
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2011

Re: St John post# 120998

Wednesday, 10/10/2012 4:50:57 PM

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 4:50:57 PM

Post# of 232508
This is interesting....I didn't really catch that...at least as it may connect to the timeline.

You see, that is a standard statement needed in the attorney letters and was likely correct as of July 31, 2012, the end date for the filing, at least as far as SSRF would know, however, the attorney letter has a date of September 27, 2012. At this point the stock had already been suspended, prima facia evidence of an investigation....yes it is.....no really...it is........ok don't believe me...

So did they just change the date on the attorney letter and not really consider whether they had an obligation to report that....or can they say the letter states the situation on Jul 31?