XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[xlt leader]

Another Post In response to Mr. Kim Quite interesting From Seeking Alpha site

The Court's Order is to 'produce revenue from properties'. This would appear to be an additional sum to be added to the Claim, thereby boosting the Total Amount. Let's give Google some credit: they likely did supply correct Sales Revenue numbers for it would not be their own interests not to do so. Kindly remember 'triple damages' are a distinct possibility if and when the case goes to Trial which is looking more likely and the final Award could be startling, as was the case with the 'Blackberry folks'. Mr.. Stout, perhaps the finest Patent Lawyer in the Land did offer '

Blackberry folks' a very reasonable settlement before Trial. Just like in that Case I expect Google to turn it down and suffer severe consequences including follow-on law suits against Google Customers. Google no doubt is also thinking about protecting their Customers, so they are in a bit of a pickle from all sides. Maintaining good relationships will also be on Google's mind. After all Vringo has 'other Patent stuff' that Google may well want to license. The Case get's ever more interesting. Mr..
Stout, Patent Attorney par excellence is not someone you want to face in Court! Google has a great opportunity to show the World that people like Andrew Lang, Inventor par excellence are rewarded directly or indirectly for creating massive wealth. It's looking more like Trial as time-frame narrows, just like 'the blackberry case'. And $revenue+property revenues plus triple-d are moving up!