InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 81
Posts 21289
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/07/2006

Re: Nobody2 post# 48520

Monday, 10/08/2012 12:40:34 AM

Monday, October 08, 2012 12:40:34 AM

Post# of 280233
i personally dont attribute kblb with any scientific accomplishments...the science was already going on without kblb...those scientists were not employed by kblb...kim did see an opportunity to get involved and has supported the research minimally with funds...he did get the rights to commercialize the products and began the patent process etc...

to my knowledge, kblb still does not employ any scientists..they in fact employ no one....if kblb goes bk, the science will continue without them...they are not necessary to the science...but without the science, kblb is nothing...

kblb's function is to commercialize the science...forget about attributing accolades to kblb...they either sell the product or they are toast...

kim saw a good opportunity...he went for it...nothing wrong with that...but imo he made some bad mistakes...nothing insurmountable but unnecessary mistakes...he continues to make mistakes...at some point he needs to start "gettin er done"....unfortunately i have serious doubts thats going to happen...

certain things needed to be done that werent...its to the point where he needs to close a very good deal...a crappy one will no longer do...and time is of the essence...

i agree that if the business was as successful as the science, kblb would be worth a lot more...but the science has had its issues as well...

but with that said, given what seems to be the potential of spidersilk, 4 cents a share is horrendous...theres no excuse for the pps to be that low...unless of course, things are not as good as most seem to think...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News