InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 47
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/2003

Re: diode31 post# 6542

Sunday, 10/07/2012 6:15:44 PM

Sunday, October 07, 2012 6:15:44 PM

Post# of 68424
Listen the judge isnt allowing the language "patent troll" so you shouldnt use it either. this is not the case. Lang is inventor and its his to profit off. He sold it to lycos and lycos decided to let google slide for other business reasons and I'm sure google had fingers crossed they could get away with free technology for the length of the patent. Lang had his hands tied and im sure was never happy Lycos played so nice. Google founders were never in this for a pure monetization play. For it to survive and grow it became necessary also why they were not first to think like Lang was. Lang deserves this money. it is a simple case. Google's luck just ran out thats all. Their free ride is over just like Samsung trying to pretend they innovated these Apple ideas. Everyone needs to pay---there is still plenty of money around for profit and healthy business. But if you invent it you should be paid---end of story.

p.s. Good luck with your short position---feel free to add to it. No number of Goog lawyers is going to help this case

In the end Brin and Page probably want to pay Lang because they are of similar Ilk--brethren. Its the money side of Google that is fighting this. Brin and Page never cared about Ad words or Ad sense they have other lofty ideas. Not the fun part for them. world peace, maps, health, education, politics space travel are what they work on. they are not AD Men.