InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 161
Posts 14045
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/27/2008

Re: On2_addict post# 58459

Thursday, 10/04/2012 4:43:18 PM

Thursday, October 04, 2012 4:43:18 PM

Post# of 60937
If I'm interpreting Delaware law properly, they may well opt to not act to wrap up the company's affairs and dissolve the company, until the last of the patents CLYW owns has expired. I don't think 923 is the only property that is at issue. And even after expiration, there are legacy rights which survive. The laser patent ?

Of course, I cannot possibly know what the receiver WILL opt to do... but, then, he probably doesn't know either, yet ? I don't expect him to be omniscient. That's reserved for IHub posters.

The receivers' charge from the judge, and his own interest, do not appear to be at odds with shareholders interest... as long as his interest is not put in conflict with the tasking from the judge.

Perhaps patience is easier... when you don't have an option. It's not like things would have gone better and faster for shareholders with the BOC instead of the receiver managing your interest, even if you're less certain now what that interest is.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.