Tuesday, October 02, 2012 10:52:59 PM
I see no reasonable interpretation as to how the judgement bars Wilf from anything other than the promotion and/or purchase/sale of penny stocks. I don't even see any wiggle room to claim he is barred from promoting stocks that are not penny stocks considering that not only does the judgement specfically state "penny stock", but it goes so far as to actually define what a penny stock is (See section III page 3). Does that make sense to me? Not really, but it is what it is.
SANUWAVE Announces Reverse Stock Split, Note and Warrant Exchange, and PIPE Offering • SNWV • Oct 18, 2024 9:31 AM
Vocodia Addresses Recent Stock Price Movement and Future Strategic Partnerships • VHAI • Oct 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Mass Megawatts Announces the Start of an Online Discount Solar Energy Equipment Business with Revenue Recognized for the First Time Since Year 2010 in this Fiscal Quarter • MMMW • Oct 18, 2024 7:32 AM
Unitronix Corp Advances DeFi Innovation with Tokenized Real-World Assets Integration • UTRX • Oct 17, 2024 7:38 AM
Mass Megawatts Commences Solar Energy Sales Efforts • MMMW • Oct 16, 2024 7:45 AM
SANUWAVE Health Announces 1-For-375 Reverse Stock Split • SNWV • Oct 16, 2024 7:40 AM