InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 43
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/16/2011

Re: scambuster2 post# 30506

Tuesday, 10/02/2012 10:52:59 PM

Tuesday, October 02, 2012 10:52:59 PM

Post# of 41960
I make no arguments for the beliefs of anyone at the SEC nor any arguments for their reasoning.

I see no reasonable interpretation as to how the judgement bars Wilf from anything other than the promotion and/or purchase/sale of penny stocks. I don't even see any wiggle room to claim he is barred from promoting stocks that are not penny stocks considering that not only does the judgement specfically state "penny stock", but it goes so far as to actually define what a penny stock is (See section III page 3). Does that make sense to me? Not really, but it is what it is.