InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 122
Posts 44491
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/06/2012

Re: sctts post# 65490

Saturday, 09/29/2012 1:45:26 PM

Saturday, September 29, 2012 1:45:26 PM

Post# of 97615
sctts, so you are going to believe the CEO of a company in a press release about the SEC suspension

a CEO of a scam company

that has filed fraudulent financial statements with the SEC

that has filed fraudulent sublicensing agreements with the SEC

that issued false and misleading press releases regarding a March 2012 3 day hot run test at a cement plant

that issued false and misleading press releases regarding an August 3 week hot run test at a cement plant

that has gotten the stock suspended by the SEC for adequacy of publicly available information - eventually leading to fraud charges by the SEC and REVOCATION

are you sure about this?


sctts Saturday, September 29, 2012 6:47:39 AM
Re: None Post # of 65578

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have taken the time over the last two days to confirm with both the SEC in Washington and the SEC Enforcement
Division Miami the reason for the suspension, which I believed was the case. This is what I was told in answer to my
questions. First, there was no Wells notice issued or sent to either me personally, the company or my attorneys. That
would have meant they wanted to receive information from the company unrelated to the financials. Second, it was
verified by them that the statement for the suspension for ten days was for the financial information needed only to
comply with the reporting company regulations stemming from errors made in 2007 and to the present 10Q. When I
asked them if they needed any other support documents or exhibits from the company or anything at all they said all
that is needed is the financial information to be filed on EDGAR.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



CEO letter to shareholders says it all. There can be no misstatements in this, as that would constitute fraud.

Case Closed

it was verified by them that the statement for the suspension for ten days was for the financial information needed only to
comply with the reporting company regulations stemming from errors made in 2007 and to the present 10Q. When I
asked them if they needed any other support documents or exhibits from the company or anything at all they said all
that is needed is the financial information to be filed on EDGAR