InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 654
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2012

Re: JJSeabrook post# 4659

Friday, 09/28/2012 1:31:10 PM

Friday, September 28, 2012 1:31:10 PM

Post# of 68424
If I am reading this correctly, this is the exact OPPOSITE of where we are in the VRNG vs GOOG case....i.e Advanced litigation and early USPTO re-exam. So, is the point of this posting to show that in "our" case, denial of motion to stay is a higher probability?

thx,

arper