InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 746
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/20/2012

Re: butterfunger post# 4474

Thursday, 09/27/2012 10:15:34 AM

Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:15:34 AM

Post# of 68424
Haha, filly! I caught that last night, too! I'm sure both judges caught it, also. One would think that a "sophisticated," high-paid GOOG atty would proof a a document before it goes out to the world! Kinda makes you wonder where else corners have been cut.

This motion to dismiss is NOT for GOOG. The referenced motion only pertains to the other defendants.. AOL, etc. Look at the parties on top left of first page.