InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 33
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2012

Re: Nellafom post# 14780

Wednesday, 09/26/2012 12:55:41 PM

Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:55:41 PM

Post# of 111138
I suspect the major holders have always held for two reasons:
1. I recall reading a post about the re-wording of the documents tied to the CTs prior to BK in terms of the guarantee which makes me think the big boys knew something and put some language in there to protect their investment
2. 5% ownership rule...something about if more than 5% changes hands then it kills the old/cold rules and potential use of NOLs.

Someone who knows more please chime in...