InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 2507
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2010

Re: Clark_Kent88 post# 63584

Tuesday, 09/25/2012 7:14:45 PM

Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:14:45 PM

Post# of 97615
98% was just day one as they turned it on, the only logical conclusion is that it went to 100% after that as previously tested and confirmed. It is also only logical that the NDA was part of what is believed to be the Ash Grove contract to simply leave it in place and running once testing was complete. Testing would not have continued if it wasn't working as advertised, in fact an extension was requested of the testing to run under additional variables and conditions. this was all PR'd to the public, PRs that no one on earth makes if they were not true as it would leave a dishonest person open to a very significant amount of legal trouble, of which there is none. And of course as everyone knows very well, the SEC's issue is adequacy only on financials, completely unrelated to the technology, testing, contracts, MSE, MBS, etc.

Transparency on all this and more is forthcoming, and thus why this is such a hotly desired stock. In fact, the minor issue of filings may have simply interrupted the process of dotting the i's and crossing the t's so announcements could be made. It will come...

GLTA...GTGP