Crow: Back again
From your Silicon Investor Board
According to the process flow chart used at MOTT, the pharmacy technicians mix the dosages as prescribed, and the Pharmacist verifies the accuracy, using the Valimed machine.
Now if the Pharmacist is truly putting reliance and faith in the accuracy of the Valimed machine, then FDA approval is surely required. As well as a healthy dose of product liability insurance. So says CROW and Crew.
It is quite evident that before ValiMed ,after the technicians mixed the dosages as prescribed,the Pharmicist must have verified the accuracy of the mixture by sniffing it himself.
ValiMed just takes that responsibility off the pharmacist's sniffer.
NOW ,ANSWER ME THIS. Did that pharmacist have to have FDA approval to sniff the mixture,or get third party verification to assure the insurance company that he knew what he was sniffing?LOL
Did you have a chance to read one of my many previous posts where it was stated that ValiMed slipped in nicely to the U
of M system or any mention of relieving the head pharmacist of the responsibility. GOSH what if he had a head cold,would 10 people die.LOL
It is quite evident that previously it was all reading formulas and hopefully accurate measuring,and hoping some drug addict hadn't possibly compromised the pre-mix.
I didn't see any mention of waiting for FDA or insurance problems at U of M Health Systems.
I believe U of M Motts was the first report for children,ValiMed now in operation for pediatrics. The second report was for U of M Health System (the big kahuuna)testing and approval for Intravenous feeding,
You've been reading too many of Tom Ridge's posts.LOL
I never never never expect to hear you say you were wrongLOL again.
