InvestorsHub Logo

es1

Followers 153
Posts 16535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

es1

Re: igotthemojo post# 48071

Monday, 09/17/2012 2:21:30 AM

Monday, September 17, 2012 2:21:30 AM

Post# of 278322
So he did it by pumping? Or he did it by letting it drop?

You are all over the place trying to make it look like something I am just attempting to put a little reality in the pessimism.

Kim does nothing but release the information as it is available to release.

Kim says We made a breakthrough and the market bulls decide that DuPont is going to buy them out.

Kim says we learned from the failure of an insertion and the market bears decides the company is an utter failure.

Both sides get a bit of help but that help doesn't come from Kim.
The bulls and bears get their help from message boards and news letters.

If the stock is over bought or over sold it is caused by the markets interpretation of ALL available information not just the information that Kim gives or fails to give.

KBLBs price is not controlled by Kim. It is controlled by you and me and anyone else who puts money here.

Sometimes the PPS is directly controlled by you or me or some other person who has no idea they are in control.
I know I have personally caused the PPS to move here with as little as 250 bucks bought or sold at the right time. I have done it a couple of times without realizing it and screwed myself too.

My point is no matter what the time frame, unless you go from start to present the PPS is not a result of a CEO.
If Kim took over and this was at .12 and now it was at .04 I could see blaming him since from start to end the PPS has dropped under his leadership. That can not be said of Kim.
The PPS under Kims leadership is still up 450%. No matter what the market, you, or me have done the overall performance of Kims lead is positive
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News