InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 6362
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/28/2010

Re: 236T568 post# 58652

Sunday, 09/16/2012 10:06:28 PM

Sunday, September 16, 2012 10:06:28 PM

Post# of 97615
Try looking at the financials for both falcon for the loans and purchase by jim in 2002 and the amount of total loans before he put it in 2004. Thank you for your review of acctounting priciples for gapp though.maybe you have knowledge of both items intamately but would love an explanation of writing something down for depreciaiton and a cash note for the purchase. Didn't know that was treated the same
BTW, still looking for the answer to your post and my question
PLAYER ONE

Sunday, September 16, 2012 9:09:08 PM
Re: 236T568 post# 58618
Post # of 58627

Actually, if you read that patent, it is not the same mixtures or the same use as GTGP and it is unproven. If you are a chemical engineer, I would appreciate it if you would enlighten me an others how it is better as it hasn't been tested by the DOE or anyone else for that matter and was filed in 2010 and hasn't ever been used, just claims and a patent. Have seen NADA in any publication within the DOE or remediation publication as well.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the original inventor of the MBS technology recently patented a new, more advances process which makes the technology used by GTGP Obsolete.