Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:13:01 PM
!!!!
Newlook message-#25 was on-topic, and should not have been deleted!
So, to preserve record of it:
LOL... It's starting to make sense why your daddy banned me when we started talking about Fanotech... He wasn't trying to shut me up... He was trying to shut YOU up
. You really aren't very good at this, are you. Are you sure you want to continue on? I should warn you that this conversation can be used against you in court . If you want to end this, all you have to do is stop responding to me... It's really that simple . But I'm happy to go on as long as you want. I already know that I know nothing, and therefore, I can only gain from this interaction .
So now you're going to resort to telling lies now. Really? I will respond to each of your lies in the order that you told them:
Again, like I said: I asked you why your family backed out of "the Joint Venture, the American Sales rights, Newlooks ownership in shares, etc"... And you made the statement: "Maybe you can understand it this way", and then you started in with your "Premium Sandwich" analogy. And then we followed that with several more exchanges talking specifically about your analogy. And now, suddenly, you're pretending you were talking about something else the whole time??? I'm sorry, but that's a LIE!
You said I am spouting nonsense??? All these things you're unhappy about me saying... Are either questions I have. Or they are things that YOU SAID with me just repeating them back to you!
You were referring to the "touters", when you made the assertion that some of them were paid... I'm sorry but accusations like these require EVIDENCE... Unless you are LYING, can you please provide your source for this, because I don't believe you!
You suggest you don't know who banned me... YOU LIE!!! Immediately after I was banned, your accomplice chouston wrote you a message letting you know that I was banned... Are you really going to suggest that you somehow missed that message, and that you have no idea who chouston is??? And that chouston didn't have me banned, but instead somehow coincidentally knew that I was banned, even before I did?
When I mentioned your "Ramshackle business", I was trying to interpret your analogy... And it was not an unreasonable interpretation... Even YOU realized that this is a logical interpretation, which seems to be why you are suddenly trying to pretend you didn't use that analogy. It's A LIE for you to claim that I was trying to state that as a fact.
The person I think you are, is an insider of Fanotech... Maybe Lisa, maybe Lisa's secretary, maybe some other insider. Are you really trying to claim that this isn't true? Are you really trying to suggest that your perpetual attempts at defending Fanotech are simply for your own amusement? Are you really trying to pass yourself off as someone who, according to you, has simply "done more research"? I can prove this statement is a LIE using your own words: Remember when jig-saw said "don't you wonder why its only lisa tomasoni and mike druin who continue to post?" Your response was: "Only an insider would know those two names"... Now, since you clearly act like you know those names, by your own definition, that means you must be an insider. So, either you were LYING then or you are LYING now.
Like I said before, I'm annoyed that your accomplice banned me when I started asking about Fanotech... Consequently, my one and only goal here, is to try to get you to slip up and reveal even more information about Fanotech... And NOTHING ELSE! If you don't like that, then STOP RESPONDING TO ME!!!
In the meantime, can you please answer the questions I keep posting. This time I put them in point form so you wont get confused. Try to respond using the same numbers, so I won't get confused :
1) What about all these open records that show Gabe lying under oath... Are you saying that that never occurred?
2) What about this nearly million-dollar lawsuit they have over Simmonds posting records that were already open to the public anyway. Are you saying that's a worthwhile pursuit?
3) If the company is in such good shape, why can't I find anything new about them online?
4) If the company is in such good shape, why is their website in shambles?
Newlook message-#25 was on-topic, and should not have been deleted!
So, to preserve record of it:
LOL... It's starting to make sense why your daddy banned me when we started talking about Fanotech... He wasn't trying to shut me up... He was trying to shut YOU up
. You really aren't very good at this, are you. Are you sure you want to continue on? I should warn you that this conversation can be used against you in court . If you want to end this, all you have to do is stop responding to me... It's really that simple . But I'm happy to go on as long as you want. I already know that I know nothing, and therefore, I can only gain from this interaction . So now you're going to resort to telling lies now. Really? I will respond to each of your lies in the order that you told them:
Again, like I said: I asked you why your family backed out of "the Joint Venture, the American Sales rights, Newlooks ownership in shares, etc"... And you made the statement: "Maybe you can understand it this way", and then you started in with your "Premium Sandwich" analogy. And then we followed that with several more exchanges talking specifically about your analogy. And now, suddenly, you're pretending you were talking about something else the whole time??? I'm sorry, but that's a LIE!
You said I am spouting nonsense??? All these things you're unhappy about me saying... Are either questions I have. Or they are things that YOU SAID with me just repeating them back to you!
You were referring to the "touters", when you made the assertion that some of them were paid... I'm sorry but accusations like these require EVIDENCE... Unless you are LYING, can you please provide your source for this, because I don't believe you!
You suggest you don't know who banned me... YOU LIE!!! Immediately after I was banned, your accomplice chouston wrote you a message letting you know that I was banned... Are you really going to suggest that you somehow missed that message, and that you have no idea who chouston is??? And that chouston didn't have me banned, but instead somehow coincidentally knew that I was banned, even before I did?
When I mentioned your "Ramshackle business", I was trying to interpret your analogy... And it was not an unreasonable interpretation... Even YOU realized that this is a logical interpretation, which seems to be why you are suddenly trying to pretend you didn't use that analogy. It's A LIE for you to claim that I was trying to state that as a fact.
The person I think you are, is an insider of Fanotech... Maybe Lisa, maybe Lisa's secretary, maybe some other insider. Are you really trying to claim that this isn't true? Are you really trying to suggest that your perpetual attempts at defending Fanotech are simply for your own amusement? Are you really trying to pass yourself off as someone who, according to you, has simply "done more research"? I can prove this statement is a LIE using your own words: Remember when jig-saw said "don't you wonder why its only lisa tomasoni and mike druin who continue to post?" Your response was: "Only an insider would know those two names"... Now, since you clearly act like you know those names, by your own definition, that means you must be an insider. So, either you were LYING then or you are LYING now.
Like I said before, I'm annoyed that your accomplice banned me when I started asking about Fanotech... Consequently, my one and only goal here, is to try to get you to slip up and reveal even more information about Fanotech... And NOTHING ELSE! If you don't like that, then STOP RESPONDING TO ME!!!
In the meantime, can you please answer the questions I keep posting. This time I put them in point form so you wont get confused
. Try to respond using the same numbers, so I won't get confused : 1) What about all these open records that show Gabe lying under oath... Are you saying that that never occurred?
2) What about this nearly million-dollar lawsuit they have over Simmonds posting records that were already open to the public anyway. Are you saying that's a worthwhile pursuit?
3) If the company is in such good shape, why can't I find anything new about them online?
4) If the company is in such good shape, why is their website in shambles?
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
