InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 3187
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2010

Re: usandy post# 57917

Tuesday, 09/11/2012 1:08:33 PM

Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:08:33 PM

Post# of 60937
Yep. They do not want it to go to a jury. As far as I can tell from what's been reported there are only about two definitions the judge has to define on his own. Those two are important, but if the judge looks to the patent, the definitions should be easy to define within the context of what the patent says. I see the ruling coming by wed at the latest. Then we wait for the jury trial in March while they file various documents hoping to get the case dismissed etc.

Another problem Tmob has is the fact they have no patent. Since calypso does have a patent, Tmob can't say they are using their own patent. And if they are using their own process that isn't patented, why haven't they filed for a patent. Because one already exists. It doesn't make sense in this day and time that if you come up with something this novel, that you would not patent it.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.