If anybody else has detailed notes they want to share that would be great. Otherwise, an opinion is an opinion and we have some disagreement as to how things went. From Sirh notes it seems consistent with the effort made by Tmob so far in their filings to get certain terms redefined. It is helpful to know how the judge approached those terms. From reading just the notes Sirh posted, it appears Tmob is still fixated on changing some of the most important terms and tmob has given up a few more term definitions. The way I read them, Calypso has better than 50/50. The terms discussed do not represent the full number of terms already agreed upon. These were only the ones they could not agree on. While they may be some of the more important ones, calypso doesn't have to win all of them to prevail. From the sounds of it, the judge had already spent a lot of time reveiwing the terms and with the expert there, I believe we'll have a ruling in quick order. Maybe this judge likes to work and spent last night consulting with the consultant, so he could come to a decision today. It would make a lot of sense to talk with the consultant while he was there in person, in case there were diagrams they wanted to discuss etc. From Sirh notes it appears some of the terms could be modified very quickly by the judge because of the additional language both parties agreed on.
I'm saying we have a ruling from the judge by or on Wed. Just the fact that Calypso has made it to this point is very encouraging.
AI
