InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253056
Next 10
Followers 838
Posts 120388
Boards Moderated 18
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biomaven0 post# 148386

Monday, 09/10/2012 1:53:24 PM

Monday, September 10, 2012 1:53:24 PM

Post# of 253056

PPHM—I concur that the FDA is very likely going to want another trial, just as they did with Provenge. However, if the fully mature data actually improves from here and there are no obvious imbalances in the arms, they might yet have a shot.

Respectfully, I think PPHM has no shot whatsoever at accelerated approval based on the second-line NSCLC trial, no matter how the data mature. On today’s CC, there was no mention whatsoever of AA, and there were plenty of opportunities to mention it in the context of what happens next, such as the end-of-phase-2 meeting and the planning of a phase-3 trial.

PPHM’s floating the notion of AA on its previous webcast was entirely bogus, IMHO, and was intended mainly to mislead unsophisticated investors.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.