I read it that way as well, but I am admittedly a NOVICE. SP stated 3 separate times at the CC that the financials reflect revenue from Philly. Can someone else put their two cents in as well? "So Philly is infact producing revenue?" "Yes, The Financials show this".
There is no doubt in my mind that, at least minimally, SP believes the financials show this. Can someone point out in Layman's terms why SP might believe this? I am not saying it does or it doesn't at this point. I simply believe that SP has honest intentions with this company and our money. Not necessarily even close to perfect, but he is trying hard, and he believes that revenue is being generated. He stated it is shown in the financials, but if it is, it isn't clear enough for this idiot to understand it.
This may be the whole problem with communication, what is obvious to SP is not obvious to this idiot.
