The Question and Answer Board

[mmayr]

Hi Bob ~~ EZ, Arch & Muelhead. . .

I'm just wondering what this stirring debate is about? Perhaps if all Directors and COBs were on the "up-and-up" this conversation wouldn't be taking place. However, I would not be opposed to having "3" officials on each thread. I, for one, can tell you all that it is not easy to officiate a site. And as well, it is not a good idea to eliminate all "negative" opinions on a stock. Particularly OTC BB stocks. However. . .there is a time when "bashing" and "slanderous statements" need to be brought under control. When I monitor the Raging Bull's site. . .it is interesting to see how the slanderous statements are set to go free. It is my observation that ihub was created to avoid this type of activity. Bob, you can correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't we hear to help investors attain quality conversation while doing their diligence? There will always be the concern that someone will become a director on the ihub board. . .and attempt to "pump" a stock. It should be easily sorted. There will probably also be people who are out to "bash" a stock that become directors. However, can I ask you or anyone else what the criteria is to determine who the "objective" directors are? And what credentials is it that make them that way? Is it merely their ability to sort/critique and eliminate that qualify them for positions on the ihub thread? Perhaps it is just trust from fellow investors? And if that is the case, isn't there the possibility of market manipulation?

Okay. . .I'm just trying to add a few points. Feel free to respond to this note or contact me in private.

Peace, everyone. . .

M&M Man