Stanton Scams? EFTI/USSE/USSP/USEI/OSSG

[MorningLightMountain]

My complaint about John D Stanton III

(as requested, keep clicking on the link for a new complaint!!!)

http://www.pakin.org/complaint?title=&firstname=John&middlename=D&lastname=Stanton&suffix=III&gender=m&shorttype=f&pgraphs=3

Ever get the idea that you've been played for a fool, that you are nothing but a mark for con artists like John D Stanton III? Well, that's why I need to tell you that you can assume serious trouble is brewing when domineering twerps encourage capricious, misinformed ideologues to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort. Many of the arguments I'm about to make rest upon the rock-solid principles of freedom of thought and freedom of speech. If it weren't for these freedoms, I wouldn't be allowed to tell you that there's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will definitely persist as long as John continues to dig a grave in which to bury liberty and freedom. He should obviously heed Cicero's advice, "Appetitus rationi pareat." (For those of you who failed your introductory Latin class, that means, "Let your desires be ruled by reason.")

Given John's record of shady dealings, we can say that it's possible that he doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of Jacobinism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we tell him where he can stick it. Accordingly, John is good at stirring his allies into a frenzied lunacy of hatred and vengeance. Doing so blinds them to the fact that the world is full of people who foment a radical realignment of industrialized economies. We don't need any more people like that. What we need are people who are willing to reinforce the contentions of all reasonable people and confute those of predatory underachievers. We need people who understand that most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions.

John says that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that he wants to hamstring our efforts to shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within his pea-sized brain. It gets better: He believes that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. I guess no one's ever told him that he says that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. Whenever I hear such statements from John I reel in disbelief. Does he really believe such lubricious things? No, don't guess; this isn't audience participation day. I'll just tell you. But before I do, you should note that this view dangerously underestimates the untrustworthy quality of antiheroism. There are important lessons in that, even apart from another reminder that John intends to put his ghastly camp in charge of promoting interventionism's traits as normative values to be embraced. We should not stand for that, with that, or by that. Rather, we should make it clear that "John" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone plaguing our minds, I tell him or her to stop "John-ing". I hope I haven't bored you by writing an entire letter about John D Stanton III. Still, this letter was the best way to explain to you that there are arguments that have made respectable people out of saboteurs like John.