InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 7515
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/05/2010

Re: WhisperingBomb post# 39570

Friday, 09/07/2012 3:16:31 PM

Friday, September 07, 2012 3:16:31 PM

Post# of 56720

From: Martin Spencer
To: NTWALLACE@aol.com
Subject: Clarification-
Reply-to: Martin Spencer

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:09:05 -0500

Mr. Wallace,

In my admittedly limited experience, when an officer refuses to
take telephone calls from the CEO, that officer has, de facto,
"quit."

Your refusal to respond to the President of this company's
calls and emails, is "quitting," not being terminated.

If marty says so, it must be true. LOL!! Riddle me this--if an employer refuses to pay an employee and the employee leaves due to non-payment--did he quit or was he fired?

Riddle me this as well--what difference does it make? Wallace has a judgment for over $75,000, approved by Judge Vaughn and Judge Nation.

spencer has always believed that if he could force someone to quit, that person would have no remedy against the company. Screw the employee, don't pay him, force him to quit and there's nothing the victim can do. As CHIEF Judge Vaughn and CHIEF Judge Nation have ruled, former employees don't lose their rights in either circumstance. Just part of the expensive continuing legal education for marty.