Wondering why the concern without an interest in investing in SIRG?
SIRG underwent a forensic audit to get the chill removed. It was done by Tarvaran, Askelson & Company, LLP.
During the past two years, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted with Marcum regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed other than that discussed above, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a “reportable event” (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
The Company provided TAC with a copy of the above disclosures and requested that TAC furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the statements made above. A copy of TAC’s letter dated August 3, 2012 is attached as Exhibit 16.1 to this Report.
That answers that question, now what "appears" to be more to the Marcum connection? Please be specific!
Maybe there is more, maybe the funding company requested a higher tier accounting firm.
Waiting for your "appears" explanation.
