Micro Imaging Technology Inc (MMTC)

[Dan321]

Come on Cotton. It said it did not identify any other pathogens that were put in the vile, by mistake. " There was 0% incidences of false positives" Not that it couldn't identify them. You will see what further development has occured these past 4 years very soon. No sense talking to you anymore. The way you interpret things to your own advantage has made it convenient for you to create your own stable of false positives. My original intent was to show that the MIT-1000 was being tested in USDA ARS independent lab., as shown in table 1 of the link in post #67075.This shows without a doubt that it was! I'm sure you'll twist what I just said around to your advantage so have at it. This is the last time I'll address your posts.