if you are better at allocating funds this should entitle you to the best of everything? forget scientific or literary achievement
. "productivity/dollars" is what makes the man. i wonder if the ceo of gm
,lets say, making 10 million a year is 200 times more productive than the union guy making 50k a year? lets just go pure darwin on it! why have any rules at all? if pure capitalism is the golden path. lords and peasants is fine with me but hold the law will you? the average fortune 500 executive from 1970-99 has had a 25 fold income increase in relation to the companies lowest paid employee, over those 29 years (1970 exec making a mere 40x that same employee). can u say that about the technicians that actually make the product being sold? i think not. it must be that these executives are just that much better. it has to be right?
ive said this before and ill say it again a guy making 50mill a year suddenly only makes 25mill the next their standard of living is not affected lol. now a guy making 50k a year gets cut in half thats a different story.
its not that the top guys are making to much its that the guys that helped them get that (and generally their help is needed) wealth might deserve a little more?
example- ceo of coca cola makes in one hour ONE HOUR, what it takes a delivery driver in columbia 15 hr days, 6 days a week all year long to make. i guess if that delivery guy worked a little harder or was more PRODUCTIVE he would be compensated appropriatly. infact that ceo is 4680 times more productive in that hour. wow superman! he deserves it ALL! imo
that driver dosent deserve wholesome food, education for himself and his children or any healthcare. thats asking way to much imo
hes just not worth it. i guess. please sire lets us have a piece of bread! lol
