InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 68
Posts 2027
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2011

Re: Suebarth post# 78229

Sunday, 09/02/2012 11:22:45 PM

Sunday, September 02, 2012 11:22:45 PM

Post# of 129054
The rationale they use in their writ of mandamus looks weak to me.....

"The writ of mandamus filed alleged that the lack of decision by DEA, "presents a paradigmatic example of unreasonable delay under Telecommunications Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC."[44] In response to the suit, the DEA issued a Final Determination on the Petition for Rescheduling on July 8, 2011.[45] The Petition for Writ of Mandamus was subsequently dismissed by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals as moot on October 14, 2011. [46] "

I feel they missed a golden opportunity to point heir redress issue toward salient contradictions found in government policy...... like the fact of DHHS approving cannabis as an alternative medical treatment a year ago..... Why isn't this glaring inconsistency enough to prevail on its own?.....

Maybe the timeline of the redress petition missed the policy shift by DHHS..... and that is why we are now looking ahead toward the 16-10-12 legal venue in D.C.....?.....

Best Wishes
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.