InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,427.47
(
-0.12%
)
US TECH 100
19,149.20
(
0.42%
)
Dow Jones
38,559.71
(
-0.23%
)
Brent Oil
82.44
(
0.57%
)
Bitcoin
65,263.90
(
-2.24%
)
Post# of 62039
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

lmcat

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 15717
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/21/2006

lmcat

Re: Warmy post# 17280

Thursday, 08/30/2012 10:18:18 AM

Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:18:18 AM

Post# of 62039
I have posted complete details about the SAS Review.

The SEC received the NT on Aug 15th as required. SIRG had 15 days to file the 10Q and it was filed early on Aug. 21st. SIRG was not late.

The problem occurred because SIRG did not know they needed SEC approval to change firms!

In a previous post I stated.

Did some more research on the SAS Review because I had never come across it before.

SAS-100 = STATEMENT OF AUDITING STANDARDS 100

http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2004/204/essentials/p42.htm



SIRG changed accounting firms but needed to request approval to change firms. SIRG needed to verify that their new accounting firm Marcum LLC is properly registered and get SEC approval to become their client.

SIRG will not have a problem with having Marcum approved.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up