OK one last attempt to explain...
JUDGES DO NO WORK. THEY MAKE THE LAWYERS DRAW UP STUFF AND ADD THEM TO THE PILE FOR HIM TO CONSIDER. AT THE RIGHT TIME, THE JUDGE DECIDES THAT HE HAS ENOUGH TO DECIDE> HE DOES NOT MENTION EVERY JOT AND TITTLE FROM HIS PILE OF STUFF..HE MAKES SURE THAT ALL HAS THEIR SAY>>AND TRIES TO CLEAR UP THE OBJECTIONS, IF ANY.
Then after he finally decides, he makes the main lawyer draw up the decision and instructions for implementation. When he is satisfied with what the main lawyer draws up, he affixes his signature. He may or may not comment, it is up to him.
Now mr SPARKS made a filing re MP, already mentioned. His remarks included that there was uncertainty re the amounts of the MP claims, and that on a legal technicality, his claims were not secured.
Now you may continue to argue with yourself on this...I am done.
CASE CLOSED, AND DISMISSED.
