I tend to disagree, the whole core of the problem is not the contract, the location, # of rooms, or $ amount . . . it is credibility.
The absence of details about the relationship between TSIL and Tivus, the lack of recent audited financials, and the history of his actions in Pink Sheet companies speaks volumes to how the markets view his credibility or that of the company.
Pragmatically, if I knew this agreement was integral to our investment in Tivus and that it enhanced shareholder value, then any contract news no matter how big or small would be newsworthy as a step in the right direction. TIVU would have to have a history of credible announcements and actions to deserve or merit this. Is it any surprise that the markets are skeptical of Tivus PR's from a company credibility stand point?
GLTU
D
