InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 257
Posts 16069
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/09/2010

Re: tob999 post# 54229

Tuesday, 08/28/2012 11:48:45 AM

Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:48:45 AM

Post# of 74729
Even if your comment was true I covered that possibility to eliminate that false argument because some OS could be turned over depending on how the deal is framed.

SO, since I HAVE THE OS COVERED in my SIMPLE calculation then can you explain WHY they ADDED 4.25 BILLION SHARES instead of 2.8 Billion? 2.8 would have been enough to reach 80% over the known OS at the time.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.