InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 44
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/08/2011

Re: Ed from PR post# 4070

Monday, 08/27/2012 9:26:52 PM

Monday, August 27, 2012 9:26:52 PM

Post# of 4675
The project is not economic...for EMM...using the worst case scenario which was INCLUDED on the PFS. Did you not read it? What if the price for EMM increases substantially - or at least more than the worst case scenario. That would make the project viable. Reduce CAPEX? Now that would also make the project viable.

Does the PFS contain ANY numbers regarding EMD/CMD/LMD? Any at all? I wonder how much it would cost to build a mine to produce the battery powders, I would think less.

For the battery companies interested in AMY's project, do you think they care that the EMM side is not economically viable? They could careless. They want the BATTERY numbers not EMM and I believe the EMD/CMD/LMD has a greater ROI than EMM, far greater.

Now if the government could kick in some funding for EMM for domestic use and strategic partners for the batteries...hmmm.