InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 1484
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2005

Re: lajet post# 74327

Saturday, 08/25/2012 1:50:14 PM

Saturday, August 25, 2012 1:50:14 PM

Post# of 119177
My post re: EPA were relegated ONLY to HHO, not HOSS. I have posted emails from the heads of the EPA units involved that there is NO TESTING of HHO by ANY one connected with the EPA. You will notice that in recent notices from HLNT that there is NO MENTION of EPA and Wildcat or Hy-Impact in conjunction with EPA testing or potential (verification. It is NOT NEEDED for this product, whic has been around for 30 years in on form or another. The EPA has for a long time NOT BEEN INTERESTED in this technology because they do not see it as a potential PROBLEM for the environment, but if it works, fine. But they are not in the business of certifying, verifying, or even approving something whose non-malignant effects are well known.

As far as the HOSS goes, I have not pressed any inquiry into the EPA since I personally see this as a newcomer to an already crowded market with limited potential for success, and a longshot as far as making profit. When you consider the existing competition, this market will be a tough nut to crack. I do not question the veracity of any claims made by HLNT execs re: the "testing" that is currently, and I hope that their 4th quarter projections come about. I am an investor, too.

There once was a man from Boston,
Who drove a little red Austin.
He was last in the race, so to pick up the pace,
He added a Wildcat and passed ‘em.

That’s it for today.