Saturday, August 25, 2012 7:51:23 AM
It is our opinion that Google may very well lose this ruling because it is in fact a dirty legal tactic. Vringo has stated in its motion for Discovery Sanctions that Google et al. knew of this Prior Art before the Markman hearing, and purposely withheld it. The fact that Google didn’t bring up these patents in the Markman hearing does speak to how their own lawyers view this case in our opinion. [sounds like Google is desperate ~!~~]
If this Prior Art clearly and unequivocally invalidated the Vringo patents, they surely would have laid it out at the Markman hearing and subsequently moved for a dismissal. Why continue to mount up legal fees and possibly annoy the Judge when the case could have been concluded quickly? This tactic of “surprising” Vringo with Prior Art post-Markman and less than two months from trial is nothing less than a delay tactic in our opinion. Even so, Google et al. may win such a last minute “Hail Mary” ruling. With Mr. Perlson at the helm of Google’s legal ship, nothing should be taken as a given for Vringo investors.
Disclosure: Enhydris Private Equity, Inc. is long VRNG
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM
Southern Silver Announces Updated PEA on Cerro Las Minitas: US$501M After-tax NPV5%; 21% IRR; 48 Month payback • SSV • Jun 11, 2024 5:26 AM
Swifty Global Announces South African Gambling License Approval • DRCR • Jun 10, 2024 9:15 AM
DaBaby and Stunna 4 Vegas's "NO DRIBBLE" Joins Music Licensing, Inc.'s Portfolio • SONGD • Jun 7, 2024 10:15 AM