InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 3187
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2010

Re: p2k12 post# 57171

Friday, 08/24/2012 2:59:50 PM

Friday, August 24, 2012 2:59:50 PM

Post# of 60938
For some strange reason that document didn't come up on my ipad until today, thanks. In all a pretty interesting development. Of course this means the daic parties can file other infringement actions against other infringers. Glad to see the Receiver is actually out there. GO GET 'EM Daic parties. Their interests are now more aligned with ours than before. Maybe this was part of the redacted agreement, they just had to bring it out in the open. And with no unelected management around the Receiver was the only person that could do it. It is quit possible the agreement had this structured into it, in anticipation of this happening. I'm here to tell you, in dealing with this case you better have thought about all of the potential possibilities. Look for more filings before the Markman, things are heating up and there are few ways to get out of the Markman at this point. The appointment of the technical guy is also pretty interesting. Well, 10 more workdays till the Markman. It remains to be seen how we're going to come out in this case, but I bet those NY lawyers have learned something from this case. I hope the judge issues his Markman ruling before my trip to NY in Oct. Big things seem to happen when I'm out of pocket and I'd like to get the info before I leave. Markman ruling target date 26 Oct.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.