I to have had some bad experiences with stock RS. In all cases loosing investment money with the RS and subsequent drop in pps. I think the difference here is the stocks I invested in that then executed a RS did so with no real forward progress. No revenue, no new product or service to offer, no new funding. So, with nothing to offer their pps sank after the RS. With CGFIA we have a company that has now made some major progress forward with no significant barriers to starting a revenue producing mill and eventually mining its own mines. For me the key here is the market cap. or what the company is valued at. The market cap. remains at $2.4M. At some point this number will go up, not down. For the pps to sink below 0.50 after the RS, as some have feared or suggested would mean the market cap. would have to fall below $2.4M. I think most here do not see that happening. The market cap. will go up. By how much we don't know. At a market cap. of 2.4M we will have a pps around 0.50. At 24M we have a pps around $5. At 240M we have a pps around $50. $240M is a conservative value for CGFIA. Some here think it should be valued at around $1B. That puts the pps around $210. I do not think it will go this high. I think Guyer is looking for a range of $20-$50. But even with a market cap. of $240M, a pps around $50, and an upgrade to a higher exchange we have a pretty good looking company compared to pre-RS. Some think Guyer will just dilute shares and add to the OS again, but this would make his latest PR a lie. And, with an upgraded company Guyer should be able to get his funding from somewhere other than share dilution.
I like many here was hoping for the pps to go from 0.0001 to perhaps 0.02 to 0.04. At 0.04 we would need a market cap. around $1B. Many of us could then make a few million dollars. We could still make the same amount of money with a market cap. of $1B and a pps around $210, but this is now less likely be happen. The RS will still allow us to profit but the RS puts a damper on the profit potential. I don't have a problem with this. If Guyer needs to upgrade to a higher stock exchange and remove the "chill" on trading then maybe we should be supporting him. He will be in a much better place to attract new money and new investors.
