InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 2631
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2011

Re: modrica post# 53310

Thursday, 08/16/2012 7:40:07 PM

Thursday, August 16, 2012 7:40:07 PM

Post# of 67010
One still can't add or modify words in a quote and present that it is a "quote". That is just dishonest and definitively misleading.
And the original post was not about the price per share at all.
If the PPS is the subject, then talk about the PPS. Your post deflects the topic. (And it wasn't even your post, so how can you state what it was intended to mean?)

The post by Kitt that I responded to said NOTHING about the PPS. So why does your post try to interject that into the middle of the response?

Trying to misrepresent a statement by a government agency and make it appear as something it is not, creates an opinion, not a quotation.

The bottom line is, the DRMS granted CGFIA "Approval with Conditions", plain and simple. There was no mention of "partial approval" in ANY document to CGFI by either the DRMS or CMLRB.

And your post asserting that the PPS "TELLS THE STORY" is quite short sighted. It says nothing about the value of the CGFIA, the POW mill or its potential.
It only reflects on a very small time period (just the last day or so) and how undervalued the stock is right now. The market is shortsighted and is indicated by how much they have "shorted" the value of the stock.

If one does look at the short sale numbers, one will see a distinct trend reversing that opinion over the last few days.
I wonder what is driving that reversal??

$CGFIA



Don't take my word for it, Do your own research! Then you will know it's true!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.