I am sorry Chad but everytime you open your mouth you lose credibility in my eyes.
And on top of that you insult me by trying to explain that "it is not rocket science". Not me personally but me and my investor friends. So if it is not rocket science can you please explain to me why the company refuses to tell the growth story to the market? Doesn't the company want a higher share price?
So you don't think that a lower share price will hurt the company. If the share price is $2 or $0.10 does it not matter for you? So it doesnt matter how many shares we issue for paying debt? It sure does to me....
Here is a question for you : Do you think you are doing a good job as an IR spending time explaining how to invest/trade a share?
Maybe it would be easier for all of us if you took a break from the board, and this time stayed away for a while instead of just telling us that "this is my last post, or something else like you've done a few times so far" and actually stay out.
I have read more than a few times that "this is my final post etc" and in a few post when YOU and your JOB is being criticized you just forget your "promise" and be back defending yourself and the company. Why is that? ... you blame us Investors (yes I am one of those) for not having the patience but you on the other hand can't stand of being criticized yourself.
Here is another question : What is the cost of issuing a press release? Maybe you just can issue some new shares and release a few for the market.. I think that would be very appreciated....
Chad wrote
"The lower the price, the better the liquidity and the faster they are absorbed into the float. It also provides long investors a better opportunity to price average.
Unless of course you guys wanted the sellers to make more profit?
It's not rocket science really. Some people just need to think outside the box.
If people sold out of frustration due to price while ignoring fundamentals, guidance and past performance, that's an investor sophistication issue, not a lack of IR effort."
