InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1763
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/07/2010

Re: downsideup post# 14671

Wednesday, 08/15/2012 3:11:36 PM

Wednesday, August 15, 2012 3:11:36 PM

Post# of 17231
Money has been spent on the mine that added to costs. an old trick for mining companies is to wrap up mine costs in a capital expenditure which has been done here but also quite a lot of cash used from production going right back into the mine.Parker was criticized for establishing too many reserves . BS ,if you ask me. That's what a prudent manager should do. I give them a pass on cash costs (due the mine) because,it is a safe up to date facility and they are very possibly ahead of competition ,including HL in that regard.

I don't have the figures in front of me but i believe that we only LOST money this past quarter because of about 1.4 million into our old friend,"ADMINISTRATION",due from the merger.If we spent on administration costs in Q2 what was spent in Q1, Don't we make a PROFIT ? I think we do.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.