InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 2502
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2005

Re: Robert C Jonson post# 86484

Monday, 08/13/2012 9:31:23 AM

Monday, August 13, 2012 9:31:23 AM

Post# of 346712
Robert, more important than impressions from respected posting parties from other IHub boards is how Dr. Thorpe's peers are responding to theories about Bavi's method of operation. That said, the anti angiogenesis comparison with other products doesn't seem to apply to Bavi's MOA. Dr. Thorpe is suggesting both mechanisms are synergistically in play, so the rationale about one or both mechanisms being shown as inapplicable will need to be resolved by reconciling with Bavi demonstrated success in treatments, or lack thereof. Pending Bavi trial results will help address such resolution.

Since the PPHM IHub board posting interchange with the moderator of that other board, who started posting here with statements about PPHM being a scam company and Bavi being a placebo treatment, I have chosen to leave the other board to itself. I observe that such remarks were at timing when the PPHM short interest was rising and pps was dropping and Russell rebalancing was imminent.

This is the IHub PPHM board, which is a site with IHub terms of use calling on posters to limit posts to PPHM the company and PPHM the stock. New posters interested in PPHM are welcome here, including your respected poster friend.

Best wishes and IMO.
KT
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News