Then why did they retroactively change their shares issued from half a billion to a billion for 2006? How can you trust an outfit that goes back, after the fact, and tells the investing public that the number of shares they've issued is double what was previously disclosed?
And really, the substance of that thread goes back to dilution. BCIT management (not naked short sellers) diluted their shareholders by over 99.5%.
How do you defend that?
"The penny stock investor may be the most dangerous creature in the investment world, at least to himself.[...]His hypocrisy becomes most apparent when he then blames his losses on the greed of others." Robert C. Dugan, Director - JRM Capital