InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 129
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2012

Re: None

Wednesday, 08/08/2012 12:18:33 PM

Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:18:33 PM

Post# of 6466
So the way I see the pattern in this board is the following:

1. If you say something negative and combine with with the word "Fact", then are are correct and have credibility.

2. If you say something positive then you are an idiot and probably a company insider


Does anyone think that there could be a valid combination of 1 and 2? Can you provide "Facts" and be Positive?

In my experience, I will be on the new category at the risk of being attacked. Here are "my" facts:

1. I personally attended one of their classes and spoke with other members and my personal experience was exceptional and I do believe that these guys have a bright future. And NO, I am not a company "Plant".

2. Because I am intrenched in the Tech community (this is actually how I heard about this company) I see them everywhere and there is a lot of Buzz about them. There is also a lot of trust and respect for their leadership.

However, what I don't understand is why they are not publically promoting that buzz in the form of communications to shareholders.

As for other so called "facts" that a few people here are throwing, they are "speculations". When someone suggest that they are "Laughing all the way to the bank", that is called "accusation" not "Fact". So if you are going to post them as "facts", please share with the group the record of the managment selling stock. That my friend is "Fact".