You are wrong;
Cen-1 did not do the first pump. They did not have a reason to. They were owed money by David Saltrelli and Peter Schuster and they have to be paid on the loan. They had not converted the shares until the end of August. The first pump was in March. David and Peter did it to lure investors into NSL for their own benefit. Who else would have done it????
The second pump was done on August 1. Right at the same time David Saltrelli was trying to convince Cen-1 to convert the loan to shares. David Saltrelli pumped the second time to show Cen-1 that a conversion would be worth their while. The conversion to shares did not happen until the end of August. Over three weeks after the pump. Highly doubt Cen-1 would pump it to bring the share price down. It would have gone down on it’s own as it has.
Even if Cen-1 paid for the pump , What about the Steady stream of PRs that went along the pumping ....
Go back and check these PRs and U will find that they were all Issued by David himself ....
.... HE KNOWS ABOUT EVEY SINGLE PUMP FOR NSAV EITHER BY DOING IT OR SUPPORTING IT ....
David Saltrelli changed the ticker to change the association of the company as a pump and dump. He can pump it as a different company. To apply more rationale to that, he changed the company from a shell company on the 25 of July which is right around the same time as the ticker change to wash his hands from the whole association from the pumping. With practical, logical, factual information, Cen-1 didn't have anything to do with the ticker change or changing it from a shell company so what does that possibly have to do with Cen-1 at all? It doesn't so that view certainly doesn't fly at all. David Saltrelli had everything to do with the ticker and shell company change.
David Saltrelli promised investors of several business strategies to make the company more visible which in turn caused current investors to invest more in hopes to cost average down their initial investment and to accrue potential investors.
He also made the site business to business to take away the need to promote to the consumer masses. This gives him a scapegoat to not have to follow through with his business strategies made to investors and potential investors which in turn gives him the ability to save his money.
David Saltrelli and Peter Schuster do not have a reason to make NSL successful. They owe no money to anyone and get a paycheck. They will not spend any money so they can continue to receive a paycheck. It would certainly be a different story if they did owe money. They would apply more effort to make NSL profitable so they could pay back their loan.
65+ company’s in 20 years. That’s over two companies a year. Most failed, one settled out of court? Something’s not right with their venture history?
Why is it important to have the ticker symbol on the website unless you are trying to sell the stock??
AI
